Warhol, The Shining, Twitter, Architecture, Strategic Planning, and Your Library
Sunday, October 26th, 2008Driving back to Brooklyn after our week-long intensive strategic planning course in Cleveland afforded me some much needed time for reflection. I drove with my sketchbook in my lap, jotting notes, steering with one hand, doing my best to see the lines on the road through the water kicked up by the many enormous trucks crawling up the inclines and barreling down the slopes. Not safe. The rainy, sleepy drive delivered me to a rural hotel with a hallway reminiscent of a horror movie, and then the next day took me through mountain passes and a misty, picturesque overlook by the Delaware Water Gap. Mental note: get that iPhone app that makes my phone into a voice recorder, this sketchbook/driving thing is a bad idea.
All week, there was a thought-thread tying together the trip and the workshop, and I had a hard time putting my finger on it. I’m closer now. Here’s my set of five observations.
1) In Pittsburgh, I went to the Andy Warhol Museum. Andy Warhol coined a phrase that we now think of as a cliché, “In the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes.” The huge collection of original Ronco and Popeil gadgets on display is a shining example of case after case of laughable, tired, tarnished, gimmicky 15-minute time slots of consumer culture. There’s an adaptation of Warhol’s famous quote that social network and bloggy people like to throw around: “In the future, everyone will be famous to fifteen people”. After seeing display cases of ghostly, dated, decrepit quarter-hour product spotlights, this updated version of the phrase begs further consideration; it gives me Gibsonesque visions of virtual scrapyards of services, profiles, personas, and groups. At least that scrapyard isn’t environmentally appalling- but it is sort of psychologically appalling, and that must have cultural ramifications of its own.
2) A second instance of accelerated culture hit me while I sat in the back of Nelson and Garcia’s panel multitasking, lamenting the fact I was missing CMJ week back in New York. Ben Sisario from the NY Times Arts Beat blog wrote brief little entries he calls Four-Word Reviews of the bands he saw, and my impression was that he was pretty right on. The way people consume music has changed so much in the last few years because of the blogosphere and file hosting services like RapidShare and Mediafire. I had a conversation with a music junkie friend a little while ago, and he said that if a song has been played 3 times in his iTunes, then it may as well be a classic. Sisario’s brief but accurate reviews of live shows and my ability to download 4 albums in 4 minutes 4 free on the internet is significant, and it certainly has bearing on future library service priorities.
3) Picking up where I left off with “4 albums in 4 minutes 4 free”, we saw David McCullough speak at the Ohio theater last Wednesday night, and one of the subjects he picked up on was the demise of the English language and the shrinking vocabulary of the average American. I can’t say I disagree with any of that; it is a statement of fact. I own this wonderful old book from the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893. The eloquence with which the writers describe building interiors is truly sufficient to build a model of the building based on the description, and all the while it conveys the beauty and emotion present in the architecture and the crowd. That said, having successfully used Twitter with 5 other people to take networked notes at Nelson and Garcia’s strategic planning workshop, I can look back at our terse, abbreviated notes and conversation and have a very good idea of the space, the content, and the mood over a period of time. I’m not ready to condemn the way we communicated, even though there was probably not a word more than 8 letters long uttered all five days.
4) In the workshop itself, the whole group showed considerable interest in ‘taglines’ for their libraries, rather than the clunky, non-descript mission and vision statements many of us publish. The tagline, much like a Four-Word Review, offers a catchy, memorable statement. It gives your library a branded identity that resonates with patrons or users in a manner that a boring old mission statement never could. A marketing strategist would tell you that your library’s success lies in channeling and steering attention toward your services. Less can be more when you define your library services, just as less can be more when you review a concert.
5) Our final exercise in the strategic planning workshop had us in small groups looking at a floorplan for a truly miserable fictional public library. Each group was given a different service priority; my group was asked to rearrange the building to support the priority “provide students with the information they need to succeed at school”. Each group then put up drawings with different colored post it notes illustrating a revised building program. The result was a set of clear images spelling out the fact that library facilities cannot be cookie-cutter style clones of one another. Instead, every facility needs to support the service priorities determined by working with the community. In a large branch library system, this would result in a diverse ecology of services. I’m interested in the way that people relate to architecture, particularly in libraries because they are some of the few true public spaces in America. There’s a school of thought that says that public space is something that is truly produced by its users and participants; that architecture doesn’t exist without people. In our workshop, the theme of specificity (ie, addressing your service priority) directly conflicted with flexibility and spontaneity. My feeling is that public space must be flexible, especially now that we’ve moved from Warhol’s 15 minutes of fame to more like 15 seconds or the even weirder 15 people. How can we address library service priorities and include flexibility in our program?
Its good to be home. Back to my library tomorrow, where I hope to use some of what I learned this week.















