<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Hendler at NYLA and some futurist ramblings of my own&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html</link>
	<description>Official Blog of the Public Library Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alisa leonard-hansen</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>alisa leonard-hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>Hey Nate, excellent post and nice job of breaking a very hefty topic down in plain English. I would offer one note-- don&#039;t forget that a very large piece of the Semantic Web puzzle lies in decentralized data availability and accessibility....the creation of a &quot;data bus&quot; that essentially operates as the web&#039;s universal database (implying standards for data markup) accessible by any application or service on the Web (through a standard query language such as SparQL)....and that this data (including user identity data, their graph or relationship data, plus any other data that can be made publicly available) would provide near-intuitive context for users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nate, excellent post and nice job of breaking a very hefty topic down in plain English. I would offer one note&#8211; don&#8217;t forget that a very large piece of the Semantic Web puzzle lies in decentralized data availability and accessibility&#8230;.the creation of a &#8220;data bus&#8221; that essentially operates as the web&#8217;s universal database (implying standards for data markup) accessible by any application or service on the Web (through a standard query language such as SparQL)&#8230;.and that this data (including user identity data, their graph or relationship data, plus any other data that can be made publicly available) would provide near-intuitive context for users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLA Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public Libraries need to look at Intel&#8217;s social media policy</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2727</link>
		<dc:creator>PLA Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public Libraries need to look at Intel&#8217;s social media policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2727</guid>
		<description>[...] get yourself thinking along these lines and to expand on my earlier post about the semantic web, check out Kevin Kelley of Wired Magazine’s presentation at the Web 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get yourself thinking along these lines and to expand on my earlier post about the semantic web, check out Kevin Kelley of Wired Magazine’s presentation at the Web 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>picked up this resource via the web4lib listserv this morning, might be good further reading for librarians interested in this topic.

http://semdl.corrib.org/Book/

&quot;Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and
technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for
the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking
technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by
major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic
technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and
relationships for digital repositories.

Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current
digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they
show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to
detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the
awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those
technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing
prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as
a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries.

This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like
digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information
retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of
both today&#039;s possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying
semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often
unstructured data.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>picked up this resource via the web4lib listserv this morning, might be good further reading for librarians interested in this topic.</p>
<p><a href="http://semdl.corrib.org/Book/" rel="nofollow">http://semdl.corrib.org/Book/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and<br />
technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for<br />
the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking<br />
technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by<br />
major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic<br />
technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and<br />
relationships for digital repositories.</p>
<p>Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current<br />
digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they<br />
show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to<br />
detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the<br />
awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those<br />
technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing<br />
prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as<br />
a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries.</p>
<p>This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like<br />
digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information<br />
retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of<br />
both today&#8217;s possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying<br />
semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often<br />
unstructured data.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>DerikB wrote: &quot;I suspect the breakthrough will come when the computers can take users’ input and make it fit the standards.&quot;

To some extent you&#039;re right; it&#039;ll have to be a hybrid approach, likely from several different groups of developers.

But Facebook and its competitors are already getting people to label their own content. Their users willingly enter their birthdays and addresses and favorite albums and books, and even connect themselves as &quot;friends&quot; to other users with birthdays and addresses and favorite albums and books. All of that is semantic data just aching to be exploited.

So perhaps the breakthrough is closer at hand than we think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DerikB wrote: &#8220;I suspect the breakthrough will come when the computers can take users’ input and make it fit the standards.&#8221;</p>
<p>To some extent you&#8217;re right; it&#8217;ll have to be a hybrid approach, likely from several different groups of developers.</p>
<p>But Facebook and its competitors are already getting people to label their own content. Their users willingly enter their birthdays and addresses and favorite albums and books, and even connect themselves as &#8220;friends&#8221; to other users with birthdays and addresses and favorite albums and books. All of that is semantic data just aching to be exploited.</p>
<p>So perhaps the breakthrough is closer at hand than we think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Foster</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>I run a QR code website in the UK. The site allocates you your own unique trackable QR code which can be traced on a google map. Not exactly the web 3.0 killer app you mentioned but maybe a good start.

More info at :-

http://www.qrme.co.uk/qrme-dynamic-qr-codes.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a QR code website in the UK. The site allocates you your own unique trackable QR code which can be traced on a google map. Not exactly the web 3.0 killer app you mentioned but maybe a good start.</p>
<p>More info at :-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.qrme.co.uk/qrme-dynamic-qr-codes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.qrme.co.uk/qrme-dynamic-qr-codes.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerikB</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>DerikB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take a look at microformats (microformats.org) as a current application of the semantic web.

Terence wrote: &quot;I suspect the real breakthrough will come when users are somehow encouraged, through whatever incentive, to label their content according to some generally accepts standard.&quot;

I suspect the breakthrough will come when the computers can take users&#039; input and make it fit the standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take a look at microformats (microformats.org) as a current application of the semantic web.</p>
<p>Terence wrote: &#8220;I suspect the real breakthrough will come when users are somehow encouraged, through whatever incentive, to label their content according to some generally accepts standard.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect the breakthrough will come when the computers can take users&#8217; input and make it fit the standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Mercado</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Mercado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>This entire concept, which is becoming more the norm with average users, but isn&#039;t quite there yet, is even more reason why librarians and people considering the profession need to get away from the idea that the work is done from behind the desk.  So much of how the new technologies function isn&#039;t based on the technology itself, per se, but on how people *behave*.

Librarianship is in a position to take advantage of a unique opportunity to become a truly user-centered industry.  This requires librarians to embrace the task of learning how to collaborate with users on a closer level than ever before, beyond the traditional notion of &quot;outreach,&quot; beyond the basic brand of &quot;books,&quot; to give users more control over the library environment -- everything from the functionality of the web site to what types of spaces and programs the library offers -- customizing the offerings to fit into the community&#039;s local context.  That can&#039;t be done from behind a desk in a passive fashion, and it requires a paradigm shift on many levels.

While the technology is shiny, and can be fun to play with (for some, it&#039;s a nightmare), it&#039;s important to not lose sight of the human aspect here.  It&#039;s not just about what programs or sites can draw the lines connecting your network, what people do with that information is key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entire concept, which is becoming more the norm with average users, but isn&#8217;t quite there yet, is even more reason why librarians and people considering the profession need to get away from the idea that the work is done from behind the desk.  So much of how the new technologies function isn&#8217;t based on the technology itself, per se, but on how people *behave*.</p>
<p>Librarianship is in a position to take advantage of a unique opportunity to become a truly user-centered industry.  This requires librarians to embrace the task of learning how to collaborate with users on a closer level than ever before, beyond the traditional notion of &#8220;outreach,&#8221; beyond the basic brand of &#8220;books,&#8221; to give users more control over the library environment &#8212; everything from the functionality of the web site to what types of spaces and programs the library offers &#8212; customizing the offerings to fit into the community&#8217;s local context.  That can&#8217;t be done from behind a desk in a passive fashion, and it requires a paradigm shift on many levels.</p>
<p>While the technology is shiny, and can be fun to play with (for some, it&#8217;s a nightmare), it&#8217;s important to not lose sight of the human aspect here.  It&#8217;s not just about what programs or sites can draw the lines connecting your network, what people do with that information is key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hog comment space, but I have one more brief note. As for your point in your penultimate paragraph about people and location: bingo. All of our interactions on the Web - or as Tim Berners Lee is now calling it, the &quot;social graph&quot; - including search and social communication, will become highly place-based, local, and personalized. Or at least as personal as we&#039;re willing to hand over information about ourselves. For a taste of this, check out what http://www.socialminder.com/ is doing with mapping our Gmail contacts with our LinkedIn contacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hog comment space, but I have one more brief note. As for your point in your penultimate paragraph about people and location: bingo. All of our interactions on the Web &#8211; or as Tim Berners Lee is now calling it, the &#8220;social graph&#8221; &#8211; including search and social communication, will become highly place-based, local, and personalized. Or at least as personal as we&#8217;re willing to hand over information about ourselves. For a taste of this, check out what <a href="http://www.socialminder.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialminder.com/</a> is doing with mapping our Gmail contacts with our LinkedIn contacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>I work with RDF, RDFS, OWL, and ontologies, and I think you&#039;re right about how they will provide the platform for the next phase of the Web. Researchers and developers are working it from several different angles, from tedious and resource-heavy hand-coding to machine-generated tags that are then refined through use.

I suspect the real breakthrough will come when users are somehow encouraged, through whatever incentive, to label their content according to some generally accepts standard - in essence meeting machines halfway. And that incentive could take any form, from monetary to fun to simple ease of use (we all know what it takes to get us to do something). Furthermore, of course, there&#039;s loads of legacy data that we&#039;ll have to deal with, so automation will play a part if none of it is to be lost.

I also suspect a breakthrough will occur through mobile computing, which is becoming more the norm and demands small packets of richly described data. Depending on how rich that metadata is, our handhelds could conceivably one day become an network of devices that constantly share and flow - but don&#039;t natively store - semantically coded data. For more on this: http://playfullibrarian.blogspot.com/2007/10/evolution-of-machines.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with RDF, RDFS, OWL, and ontologies, and I think you&#8217;re right about how they will provide the platform for the next phase of the Web. Researchers and developers are working it from several different angles, from tedious and resource-heavy hand-coding to machine-generated tags that are then refined through use.</p>
<p>I suspect the real breakthrough will come when users are somehow encouraged, through whatever incentive, to label their content according to some generally accepts standard &#8211; in essence meeting machines halfway. And that incentive could take any form, from monetary to fun to simple ease of use (we all know what it takes to get us to do something). Furthermore, of course, there&#8217;s loads of legacy data that we&#8217;ll have to deal with, so automation will play a part if none of it is to be lost.</p>
<p>I also suspect a breakthrough will occur through mobile computing, which is becoming more the norm and demands small packets of richly described data. Depending on how rich that metadata is, our handhelds could conceivably one day become an network of devices that constantly share and flow &#8211; but don&#8217;t natively store &#8211; semantically coded data. For more on this: <a href="http://playfullibrarian.blogspot.com/2007/10/evolution-of-machines.html" rel="nofollow">http://playfullibrarian.blogspot.com/2007/10/evolution-of-machines.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://plablog.org/2008/11/jim-hendler-at-nyla-and-some-futurist-ramblings-of-my-own.html/comment-page-1#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plablog.org/?p=1123#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>From the world of a person who constantly has to come up with systems for cataloging video images (in documentary post-production), the only thing more amazing would be a program that does the same thing, but has the ability to recognize faces and locations, and to decipher speech. Web 4.0? Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the world of a person who constantly has to come up with systems for cataloging video images (in documentary post-production), the only thing more amazing would be a program that does the same thing, but has the ability to recognize faces and locations, and to decipher speech. Web 4.0? Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

